<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Savings and Retirement Forum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://savingsandretirement.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://savingsandretirement.org</link>
	<description>Where academia, industry, and the policy world gather</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 15:34:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>It Simply Cannot Last</title>
		<link>http://savingsandretirement.org/2012/05/19/it-simply-cannot-last/</link>
		<comments>http://savingsandretirement.org/2012/05/19/it-simply-cannot-last/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 15:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jordan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savingsandretirement.org/?p=669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recession decimated retirement savings, which led many to assume Boomers would postpone retirement for a few extra years of income, savings, and productivity. That assumption was wrong. In fact, the opposite appears to be true; more Baby Boomers are retiring by the time they reach age 65, than were doing so back in 2008. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The recession decimated retirement savings, which led many to assume Boomers<br />
would postpone retirement for a few extra years of income, savings, and<br />
productivity. <a href="http://www.bankrate.com/financing/retirement/boomers-calling-it-quits-by- 65/?ec_id=m1078090" target="_blank" class="liexternal">That assumption was wrong</a>. In fact, the opposite appears to be true;<br />
more Baby Boomers are retiring by the time they reach age 65, than were doing so<br />
back in 2008. Not only was the assumption wrong, it was wrong in direction and<br />
magnitude. The percentage of workers retiring by 65 skyrocketed in the past four<br />
years from 19 to 45 percent. This means that more retirees are pulling benefits for a<br />
longer period of time, albeit slightly lower benefits.</p>
<p>The expectation of retirement at 65 as an inalienable right will die with the Baby<br />
Boomers— longevity for those who reach age 65 is increasing at a rate that cannot<br />
be ignored. What is being ignored is the fact that Social Security’s impending<br />
insolvency—spelled out in some detail in the most recent <a href="http://www.ssa.gov/oact/tr/2012/index.html">Social Security Trustees<br />
Report</a> &#8211;won’t take place until the Boomers are all safely guarded against<br />
reasonable modifications benefits for the solvency of the program. Those benefits<br />
will be paid for by the next generation or two while those workers will have to work<br />
longer, pay more, and receive less in benefits no matter if the system experiences<br />
substantive reform.</p>
<p>Stephen Marche draws the analogy of current entitlement policy to the Baby<br />
Boomer generation <a href="http://www.esquire.com/features/young-people-in-the-recession-0412" target="_blank" class="liexternal">cannibalizing their young</a>. Beyond a fiscal responsibility issue,<br />
entitlements are now an issue of generational injustice. Current generations have<br />
been trying to claim a portion of the largesse of future economic growth for a while,<br />
but the extent to which this is being done today threatens to diminish or even erase<br />
future economic growth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://savingsandretirement.org/2012/05/19/it-simply-cannot-last/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome to the New Savings and Retirement</title>
		<link>http://savingsandretirement.org/2012/05/09/welcome-to-the-new-savings-and-retirement/</link>
		<comments>http://savingsandretirement.org/2012/05/09/welcome-to-the-new-savings-and-retirement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 18:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savingsandretirement.org/?p=644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Savings and Retirement Forum is dedicated to bringing together scholars, policy staffers, and industry experts to discuss and explore issues related to the issues of pensions, savings, and retirement. The goal of the forum is to help inform those who advise policymakers of the most current research in the field. &#160; The Forum hosts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Savings and Retirement Forum is dedicated to bringing together scholars, policy staffers, and industry experts to discuss and explore issues related to the issues of pensions, savings, and retirement. The goal of the forum is to help inform those who advise policymakers of the most current research in the field.</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>The Forum hosts a monthly breakfast in Washington DC as well as an annual one day conference each Summer while informing its members of events, research, and news relevant to the field.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://savingsandretirement.org/2012/05/09/welcome-to-the-new-savings-and-retirement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

